MArcomage

Free multiplayer on-line fantasy card game

Please log in

Arbnos on 15:19, 26. Oct, 2011
Add Banish?
Lord_Earthfire on 15:25, 26. Oct, 2011
I think that this card is already powerfull enough, i don't believe that it needs a keyword like this.

And above this, we already got a huge amount of banish cards, so durable become quite weak.
MeCho on 20:40, 8. Nov, 2015
Even if we removed the condition and made it always deal 34 damage this card would not be overpowered for the cost of 27 resources because well even for cards with keywords(less powerful) this could do 41 damage now i understand that this card is mixed cost and that it has Legend but still it could use a buff im not saying we should remove the condition im saying we could buff the always damage or conditional damage or both
Zaton on 23:32, 8. Nov, 2015
Eh, I...suppose? But only out of principle. Azure Unicorn could be given a buff to fit the bill, but everything considered it is still a decent card. A change falls into a clear category of 'whatever'.
Lord_Earthfire on 10:29, 9. Nov, 2015
You have to see that its a split-cost card. If the üure cost would be recuruits only, then you would be right. But as its stated right now, the condition is needed to make it a reasonable card even with the buff.

I found this card beeing one of the more powerfull cards in the mage/legend deck among the uncommons, so i don't think it need really a buff. Probably an "else" possibility like a gem gain would make the card more usefull for rush decks. But i don't think that rush decks really need another card at their disposal.

Compre with Reserve forces for example. It costs more but has two modes, qhile the unicorn got the legend keyword. A free facility is nothing to scoff at.