MArcomage

Free multiplayer on-line fantasy card game

Please log in

NG_Beholder on 09:53, 9. Sep, 2011
After some games I'd have to say this card offers too high attack for its cost. In fact, this is one of the few cards with unlimited attack, and the only one with no drawback. Moreover, it benefits you to raise your facilities and punishes enemy for the same.
I suggest to rework Suzaku like this:
Rare, Burning, 20/20/20
Facilities: +1
Attack: 6N, N = total facilities
Damalycus on 10:21, 9. Sep, 2011
I'd left it as it is, only adding some condition, like number of your facilities must be odd or something.
NG_Beholder on 14:36, 14. Nov, 2011
And again. I won with Suzaku many times, I lost to it many times as well. And this card has absolutely ridiculous attack after a couple of facility+ cards, and no matter who played it - you or your opponent.
It's the strongest offensive card by now, and the fact thit it costs 25 stock doesn't change it. In fact, mixed cost like that makes it even stronger.
Genbu: 30 bricks, relies on your quarry to attack and on enemy quarry to build. Relatively cheap - bricks is the cheapest resource in game - but much weaker than other cards from this serie.
Seiryu: 50 gems, relies on both your and enemy magic to attack. Strong, but expensive and situational.
Byakko: 20 recruits, relies on your dungeon to attack, enemy dungeon is against it. Relatively cheap, but its cost raises with every play, and it's not so easy to "feed" it.
And Suzaku. 25 stock, relies on ALL facilities. 90 starting damage, 100 with Glacial temple, 110 with Enlightement, 150 with New era, 190 with Wonder... etc, etc, etc.
Remake it into something else. Please. This one is like All-elemental attack with no drawback and needs to generate resources.
Damalycus on 14:56, 14. Nov, 2011
And again i say:

If total facilities in game = odd number - suzaku strikes

so we have 3 3 3 + 3 3 3 =18 need to adjust before playing suzaku

i play magic+-, enemy plays dungeon-+ to postpone his death and so on
Fithz Hood on 15:17, 14. Nov, 2011
Actually I like it as it is, I don't want to change its text.
Rising the cost to 33/33/33 (or even more) should make it balanced.