MArcomage

Free multiplayer on-line fantasy card game

Please log in

Lord Ornlu on 18:19, 29. Mar, 2010
55 attack for 50 resources. Both players lose 10 stock. That's not a rare burning. it has a great cost (dragons can be played at this cost and they might even deal higher damage). The stock reduction for both players is a great loss, and the way I realize the game, rares are supposed to provide an immense effect compared to the resources they are costing. (i.e. each resource deals about 2-3 damage). In my oppinion this should have a cost reduction, or at least remove the stock loss for the player who plays it. Perhaps replace stock loss with flare attack?
jbryant3 on 18:30, 29. Mar, 2010
Overall I agree that Efreet needs a buff.
Progressor on 18:53, 29. Mar, 2010
Comparing to the most comparable Dragons (Bone / Ether) it's weaker, yes.

Giving it flare attack doesn't really appeal to me as balance measure. It changes the card fundamentally. Id suggest just making it a lil cheaper or a minor Attack boost.
Lord Ornlu on 02:03, 30. Mar, 2010
Flare attack was just a suggestion, in case the creator of this card feels that the stock destruction is in the nature of the card (I remember Efreets in Heroes of Might & Magic always were powerful but could hurt both you and the opponent) and wants to keep affecting both players negatively
jbryant3 on 02:26, 30. Mar, 2010
I think Efreets and Genies should be distinct cards. Right now they are fairly similar. Efreet could do more damage but only hurt your stock maybe...?