MArcomage

This should have a Legend keyword (like Koshei). All of [insert name] the [insert noun or adjective] should have legend keywords (especially after the legend nerf). Because they are unique as opposed to the generic "Clay golem" or equivalent.

This Card is durable and swift, so this Card would be devesating with the legend keyword.

Does anyone play this card now?

I play it, but mostly because I like the card :P. I would add the legend keyword only if the resource gain was removed.

My only thoughts are on the consistency of the game. It seems to me that all "unique" cards should be Legendary.

To card usage and suggested changes, I'm really hoping for those card stats :) so we can see how many cards of the cards are truly played

The attack this card deals is not so great, compared with its rarity and cost. It's swift, durable and enduring, but someone would have to have a very high amount of resources in order to play it consecutively more than twice. Perhaps replace the Enduring keyword with Legend, and add the Enduring damage in the normal damage this card deals (transform it into smth similar to Vampire Lord)

I wouldn't say that this Card is in any way underpowered, compared with Lord of Time. Lord of Time is, like Arthoria the Saber, durable and swift. Arthoria got also the banish keyword, Lord of Time got the Mage Keyword. This Card deals in fact more damage than Lord of Time, with 40 after the second playing of this Card, and with this, i would say that this Card is more effective than Lord of Time, since this Card got a reduction of Cost for the first playing of this Card, but less damage.
So with this, this Card is, compared with Lord of Time, the way that it is well balanced and don't need the Legend Keyword, since this or the remove of the Enduring Keyword would destory the idea of this Card.

(An Legend/Durable/Swift Card would be overpowered anyway, the cost does almost not matter)

hmm maybe u r right, but still it takes a lot of resources to achieve the effect, and with these kinds of resources, u might be able to deal more damage through other cards than this one

Now I get Arthoria's new strength. It will always give +1 lowest facility. :)

Ouch, that wasn't intended.

only way to avoid is a hack

Not really.

Now that I think about it, I'm inclined to leave this little exploit and balance the card around it. Do you think it would be too OP in current form?

No I don't. I say leave it as it is. Arhoria got weakened by removing Far sight, so this balances it.

First of all, I think Arthoria's rework was completely unneeded, so I'd just revert this change and forget about it. Two things: you can't draw a rare after Swift, which makes persistance less effective, and now this unintended thing.
You could just change her attack to 25 base/15 enduring or slightly lower her cost, and that wouldn't create any problems with it. What was the purpose of this rework - Gilgamesh's happiness?

First of all, I think the previous version didn't work as intended and was too much similar to Lord of time. Now, it makes more sense to play her only once as a combination with some other card. Also, we now have official limit of 4 keywords per card. 5 keywords can produce layout issues for some browsers. I can do some changes to this card, but I don't think reverting back to previous version is a good idea.

There are many similar cards - Beast mistress, White crocodile and Manticore, for example. Or Light and Heavy cavalry.
Old Arthoria's pitiful base attack was the only reason why she wasn't effective when played only one time in a row. You could leave Far sight and Durable, remove Enduring completely and raise attack to 30-35. In that case Arthoria would worth playing only once.

Well, I'll be watching the use of this card closely at least until the next balance changes. If I feel adjustments are needed, they will be done.

Arthoria is a bit too strong thats why its number 1 in card statistics list.I say atleast remove the fact that it always gives +1 to lowest facility regardless whether or not there is a rare card in hand

I support MeCho's notion~