MArcomage

It's too strong for it's value and rarity. War Elephant and Devastator both cost a very high amount of recruits and their prerequisites to lower the wall to 0 are easily met (just like this card). Maybe increase the cost, or make it a rare, otherwise it will unbalance the keyword balance

Alternately, the condition could be made more complex. I agree that it would simply be too easy to use in its present state.

It's still too strong and can lower the wall very easily

I think it's overpowered.

Not to disagree...if 4 people feel it's overpowered, then it is. I guess I was just looking at it from a different perspective.

I wouldn't use this card in many decks. Uncommons are good, and it's always the hardest to pick these. It does no damage, only wall - and seems situational in that sense (unlike Desolator and Elephant). Many times an opponents wall won't ever get over 35.

But I'll turn it rare or put an additional requirement on it if that helps...

"Tower lowered to the next height that is divisible by 10."

soo, if you have 10 tower you will lose, right?

Since it lacks a phrase like "If Enemy tower is not divisible by 10" you will loose in that case indeed.

there is a card that says: "wall raised to next height that is divisable by 10"
if you have a wall of 10 though, then nothing happens. So maybe nothing happens here as well

Strive for height: If Wall is not divisible by 10, Wall is raised up to the next height that is divisible by 10

It does nothing when you have 10 because it says it will do nothing when you have 10. Without that If statement, as is the case with the proposed card, it would happen when it is at 10.

i stand corrected