MArcomage

Free multiplayer on-line fantasy card game

Please log in

DPsycho on 18:50, 22. Feb, 2010
"Attack 10
If enemy lowered your resources more than 7: attack 22"

Do you intend for it to attack 22 instead of 10, or for the condition to grant a total of 32 attack? Whichever it is, the text should be reworded to clarify.

"If enemy lowered your resources more than 7: attack 22
Else: Attack 10"

versus

"Attack 10
If enemy lowered your resources more than 7: attack an additional 22"

or (alternately)

"If enemy lowered your resources more than 7: attack 22
Always: attack 10"
Fithz Hood on 12:09, 23. Feb, 2010
I wrote it quickly, the right phrasing is the second one you proposed. now I edit it.
dindon on 17:53, 23. Feb, 2010
I really like the flavour of this card. Dragons are supposed to be protectors/hoarders of treasure! I approve.

I think you could make it a little bit stronger though.
Fithz Hood on 11:47, 24. Feb, 2010
dindon wrote:

I think you could make it a little bit stronger though.


I'll rise the attack to 26
Lord Ornlu on 12:11, 24. Feb, 2010
I think -7 stock is already a very rare thing to happen. Maybe lower the condition to -5?
Fithz Hood on 12:12, 24. Feb, 2010
Lord wrote:
I think -7 stock is already a very rare thing to happen. Maybe lower the condition to -5?

it's -7 resources, not stock. eg: this card is good against poltergeist
Progressor on 13:41, 24. Feb, 2010
Why did I missed that?
With that, the condition is quite feasable. Nice!