MArcomage

really nice idea, super offensive since it burns the enemies bricks in addition to its attack value they won't be able to rebuild easily

It is storm of bricks or implosion, can't really understand. Anyway, bad idea.

almost every time the opponent masses up bricks. It's not a really bad idea, but it will be extremely powerful, and almost too easy to play if it comes along

This shouldn't cost bricks.

This Card i like Mana burn, only with bricks instead of gems.
It's different to storm of bricks or implosion, since storm of bricks uses your bricks to deal damage and implosion doesn't reduce the enemy bricks to 0 and deals Damage based on enemy bricks and quarry.

But in my opinnion, this card is far too strong, since it is a difference to consume all enemy bricks instead of gems. Bricks are used to improve the defense and without this bricks, the enemy is almost defeated after a strong attack with this Card.

Xpoh: why?
Lord Ornlu: it's rare ...are lot of other rare cards have that same problem
DPsycho: why not? because of burnning keyword? or the offensive side?
Lord_Earthfire: yes, I was inspired by Mana burn in the creation of this card.
Maybe adding +30 bricks to the enemy after the effect?

Partially the offensive nature of it (and how much easier it is to gather bricks than gems or recruits), and partially because (from a realism standpoint) I can't figure out how someone causes this to happen by spending building materials and without magic. I'm not against a punisher for the opponent stockpiling bricks, but I think, like Mana burn, the card should cost gems to use.

Dpycho: the concept in my mind would be that we used the bricks to make the river of lava to flow in the tower direction...
do you have a sugestion for gems costs? 10?

changed it to
18/10/0
Attack: N
Enemy Bricks = N/2
where N is #Enemy Bricks

That would make me say: to cheap for it's damage potential. Then Id half before the attack rather then after.