MArcomage

I really like it, even though it's probably a little too cheap for all it's advantages

tweaked it a little, consider it being rare to be able to gain both wall and attack and hopefully someone finds a way of shortening the text

This makes me miss DPsycho's Mimic card idea. I still wish that could have been implemented :/

Yeah. I was wondering if the forum would auto-merge the discussions since they shared the name, but it seems they properly get their own.

If enemy wall increased N last round then wall +N (max.7)

If wall decreased by N last round then attack = N (max.6)

No, you wouldn't want to use N for both variables since this card can have both effects occur simultaneously. You'd want separate variables N and M. (Consider what the effect should be if played after Petrified minotaur or Crystal golem.)

However, I think using variables wouldn't make the card read any better than it does now. I'd just reword it to "attack for that amount (max 6)"

yes it is indeed cost efficient against cards such as minotaur even thou its not providing really strong offence/defence at that points but i think its made up for buy its weak spots that are, if the enemies use cards with just attack/defence, if the enemy uses cards with -tower and the fact that while your enemies are offensive you are better off being defensive and vice versa.

then use Else conditions, or even better Mode conditions (here the player will set manually what happened the last round, but the system will check it either way. if the player set to increase wall but there was no attack on his wall, then nothing will happen)

Why would he use modes or Else conditions? It's -supposed- to do both when applicable.