MArcomage

Free multiplayer on-line fantasy card game

Please log in

Lord Ornlu on 00:00, 23. Nov, 2009
there should be an average cost at least, because keep attacking with 3 and receiving the same card u can play for free over and over is kinda unfair :)
Lord_Earthfire on 08:05, 23. Nov, 2009
But you have to face the fact that you have to discard anone card every time. And Ninja is stronger than this Card, even if it only cost one recource and you dont need to discard another card.
Lord Ornlu on 08:45, 23. Nov, 2009
true but there's always cards u dont need in hand at that moment
e.g. -5 enemy bricks when ur enemy has no bricks or too much

so it's not hard to discard a card and again you can receive it over and over again
Lord_Earthfire on 08:55, 23. Nov, 2009
Even then, a Ninja with -3 enemy tower is stronger than that ^^
And 1 resource is none cause to turn damage to tower damage. Also the side effeckt can get worse if you got too much rare cards or good cards on your hand.
Lord Ornlu on 11:00, 23. Nov, 2009
True, but if ur game is based in rare cards and ur hand is filled with them, then u r not going to put this card in the game at all
Noak on 16:15, 23. Nov, 2009
The use of this card would be in situations where you would have otherwise discarded at the cost of a card slot.
Noak on 16:22, 23. Nov, 2009
I think you two guys are both kinda wrong thou. 3 damage is not much for a turn, You dont always have a card you want to discard and doing so isn't always worth 3 damage as there is quick+common discard cards.
Progressor on 17:41, 23. Nov, 2009
It's definatly not to strong or something. As it is now, I would never pick it. (Whereas I would consider Ninja for a direct damage deck.)