MArcomage

Free multiplayer on-line fantasy card game

Please log in

sol on 21:45, 24. Mar, 2011
I think it's a great card.
That's all :)
DPsycho on 23:22, 24. Mar, 2011
Unless I'm missing something, this could be more simply displayed as:

Enemy wall -20
Attack 20
Fithz Hood on 23:24, 24. Mar, 2011
mmmmmmmh. yes...
it's not so interesting after all
Fithz Hood on 23:46, 24. Mar, 2011
Edited. now it probably needs some balancing
DPsycho on 00:03, 25. Mar, 2011
Wait, after the change it just says "wall" which would mean YOUR wall. I assume you mean the opponent's wall, right?
Fithz Hood on 00:18, 25. Mar, 2011
yes, sorry; I'm a bit tired, I'll change it and then I'll go to sleep. good night
HivedOne on 13:56, 12. Apr, 2011
Holy one... a real stunner... IMO... a little ocean queen without the "previous-card-bonus"... but cheaper and not rare... of course, the attack depends on opponents tower height... but in most cases tower should be higher, then wall (when not playing vs. tower-crusher)...

I think it is too strong... although Sea-monster has similair attack (and the potential recruits-bonus), but therefore worse ressource-type. But IMO sea-monster is the best uncommon aqua at all..

hard to compare... what do others say??
Fithz Hood on 15:33, 12. Apr, 2011
Yep, it still need some balancing.
anyway this card can't kill you if you have 10 or more wall. and it's really weakened by road to walhalla (and walhalla itself).
I either would like to hear other opinions on this card.
NG_Beholder on 15:41, 12. Apr, 2011
In my opinion it is at par with Treant and Undead cavalry. So it's fine, I think.