MArcomage

I like the idea of the card, but it's quite weak for an uncommon right now.

*Frowns*
Added Mage keyword?
I feel keywords should be the creators choice. There is nothing wrong with a keyword-less card. You can alway suggest it in it's thread if you feel it should have a keyword.

Not every card should have keywords, even if it fits flavor-wise. Personally, I'm in favor of more cards that will make Witcher decks possible.

Also, I'm not sure the Mage keyword fits the alchemist flavor. Aren't alchemists supposed to be able to do what they do without resorting to magic?

well, they were chemists as we see it today, but back then alchemy was a magician's trade if I'm not mistaken, either way, what the card does doesn't require a mage keyword. In fact I wouldn't give it any keyword at all. It already has 3 possible effects and one negative. usually cards that also have negative effects don't have a keyword, and that I think adds a bit to their unsteady nature.

and I agree with Progressor. Perhaps it would be better to just comment and allow the creator to change the card, unless you can find a way to make the text shorter maybe, or more functional?

If you know it suits the intention of the concept(creator), making the change is perfectly okay.
In this case you don't, you just "felt" like it did.

I have to agree. Changing keywords on conceptual cards alters the way they would work with existing decks and strategies. Corrections should probably be focused on fixing misspellings and clarifying muddy text rather than alterations that change the very nature of the card.

Ok, I remove the keyword. From now on I will first post in the forum all significative changes I'll made to concepts.
Anyway alchemist are mages in my opinion (in a fantasy game at least)